NLRB Proposes New “Joint-Employer” Test

The National Labor Relations Board released a Notice of Proposed Rule Making addressing the standard for determining “joint-employer” status under the National Labor Relations Act. The proposed rule seeks to rescind and replace the joint-employer rule that took effect on April 27, 2020.  The proposed changes are intended to explicitly ground the joint-employer standard in established common-law agency principles, consistent with Board precedent and guidance that the Board has received from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit. 

Under the proposed rule, two or more employers would be considered joint employers if they “share or codetermine those matters governing employees’ essential terms and conditions of employment,” such as wages, benefits and other compensation, work and scheduling, hiring and discharge, discipline, workplace health and safety, supervision, assignment, and work rules.  The Board proposes to consider both direct evidence of control and evidence of reserved and/or indirect control over these essential terms and conditions of employment when analyzing joint-employer status.

According to the Board, “[i]n an economy where employment relationships are increasingly complex, the Board must ensure that its legal rules for deciding which employers should engage in collective bargaining serve the goals of the National Labor Relations Act. Part of that task is providing a clear standard for defining joint employment that is consistent with controlling law. Unfortunately, the Board's joint employer standard has been subject to a great deal of uncertainty and litigation in recent years. Rulemaking on this issue allows for valuable input from members of the public that will help the Board in its effort to bring clarity and certainty to these significant questions.”

It will be interesting to see the input from members of the public to this interesting development. The issue of joint-employer status has raised difficult legal issues under a variety of labor, employment and benefits laws over the past several decades.

Previous
Previous

Biden Administration Proposes Significant Changes to Gender Equity Law Title IX

Next
Next

Supreme Court to Hear Harvard and UNC Affirmative Action Cases